Posts Tagged ‘facilitation’

Getting your eye in

Sunday, July 14th, 2013

I was looking in our pond today and discovered a 2″ long baby fish, which was darting about at high speed. The more I looked in pond the more I noticed. Over a period of about 15 minutes watching we spotted another fish that size, a couple of this year’s fry and dozens of perfect, baby frogs. Ponds have fascinated me since I was very young and used to peer into my Grandfather’s pond.

Then I realised that the more I looked, the more I saw. Once you were open to the possibility of their existence then the evidence was available to be found that they were there. The same is true at work and in the rest of our lives. If we don’t even consider that a person might be able to do something then we see nothing to suggest it. This is true of both the good and bad possibilities.

The expression goes “Seeing is believing” but if you don’t even consider something, then the idea that something might be possible, you are unlikely to ‘see’ any evidence for it.

This is one reason why having an outsider asking ‘silly’ questions is so useful, they consider things you might be ignoring and thus blind to.

P.S. After coming back to the pond I found four baby fish, so the harder you look, the more you can find.

When 1 + 1 is less than 2…

Wednesday, February 29th, 2012

This insight comes from researchers at the Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, who have proved that we are less intelligent in groups than on our own. When we are with others who we think are cleverer than us, we respond by becoming even more stupid than we are normally.

The researchers got 70 students together and tested their IQs (all of which were quite high, as it happens) in normal fashion. Then they put them in small groups and gave them another test, telling them between each question how they were faring relative to others in the group. They found that all the students’ scores were lower in the group test than in the individual one, but the IQs of the poorer performers were sharply lower. Those whose IQs fell the most were mainly – surprise, surprise – female.”  Financial Times

It appears that Group Think is just one of the traps that meetings can fall into, being together can actually make you less intelligent!  Unless you make the meeting more than just a talking shop.  It is important to structure them in such a way that you are able to engage everyone and draw on their abilities and experiences.  That is why properly planning and preparing for an important meeting is crucial to its success.  You need to be clear why you are meeting and what you want out of it.  Who needs to be there and how best to structure it in order to get the results you require.  This is just one reason for engaging an independent and expert facilitator. 

In certain cultures it is deemed vital that consensus be reached and meetings tend to be the way this is arrived at but people can easily agree to the wrong thing if the right questions aren’t asked, everyone isn’t listened to.  We have all been in meetings where someone’s point is lost because the chairman is either not focused on them or does not respect them.  It is often this small dissenting voice that is the key to the solution.  Effective meetings are so much more than just turning up and sitting through the agenda…

Resources:

  1. Business Meetings

The missing particle and Good Questions

Thursday, December 1st, 2011

I was listening to Prof John Butterworth talk on Friday about the search for the Higgs Boson  particle.  This is a theoretical particle that is a necessary part of of our current model of the Universe, but as yet, no one has proved it actually exists, so that is why they built the Cern collider to prove if the theory is correct or not.  At present the search is about 80% complete.  Prof Butterworth was asked why he sounded excited by the idea that they might find out that they were wrong and he  said that “It is when you realise you don’t know something that you start learning new stuff.”  I thought this was wonderful.  He then said “It is very hard in research to pose good questions”  and that is also totally true of facilitation.  Often a good question unlocks whole new fields of possibilities.  Leaders ask good questions.  Discovering that you don’t know something, that things are not as you had believed them to be changes the way you view the world and this enables you to begin changing too!

“Alice laughed: “There’s no use trying,” she said; “one can’t believe impossible things.”
“I daresay you haven’t had much practice,” said the Queen. “When I was younger, I always did it for half an hour a day. Why, sometimes I’ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.”
Alice in Wonderland.

More questions than answers

Saturday, January 9th, 2010

Recently I have been spending time online on LinkedIn, since I discovered that it had a Questions section (though it is perversely called “Answers”.)  I was very interested and impressed by the contributions, so I found myself being drawn into the ‘game’.  However. the aspect that has struck me is the difference in what happens when you ask a question as opposed to answer one.  Come up with a clever answer and maybe you’ll maybe get an accolade for “Best Answer” or a reply from the questioner.  However, ask a stimulating question and you may get 20-30 people all talking to, and engaging with, you. 

In my work as a coach and facilitator I often note that the thing that clients gain most value from is my questions.  This is strange when you consider that we live in a culture that so values ‘the expert’*.  The media is full of ‘experts’ pronouncing, and displaying their erudition, like little bantam cocks, and yet, when it comes to our lives and our businesses, who knows more about it that you do?  If you want to help someone, rather than telling them what to do, try asking a question rather than offering an opinion and see what happens.  Really good managers have know this for years, but it feels that this style of leadership is seldom represented in movies or books in praise of leaders.

I’d love to gather some examples of good questions and the impact they that they have had on you, or equally valid, the effect your good questions have had on others.

* Definitions of expert:

  • Someone who knows one thing more than you do
  • The word “expert” is formed from the conjunction of two roots which phonetically can be represented as “x” and “spurt”. Everyone knows that “X” is an unknown quantity.  A “spurt” is what one gets from squeezing a drop of water. Therefore, an expert is an unknown drip under pressure.
  • ex means “has been” .. or once was or past … pert means “lively, sprightly, in good health .. bold, forward .. skilled” … so that an expert is one who has lost the innate intelligence of their childhood.

 

“You can tell whether a man is clever by his answers. You can tell whether a man is wise by his questions.”   Naguib Mahfouz

“To be on a quest is nothing more or less than to become an asker of questions.”  Sam Leak

 

Better Business Meetings

Tuesday, May 20th, 2008

Meetings are often considered the curse of the business world; however, they are a vital tool. The reason they have such poor press is that most people haven’t a clue how to run one! Good meetings, like good food don’t happen by accident, they take careful planning and a lot of work that is unseen by most people attending them. Good meetings, like cooking, are a mixture of Art & Science.

“A meeting is an event where minutes are taken and hours wasted.” James T Kirk

The work falls into three phases:

Before:

Firstly you have to clearly decide why you are having the meeting? What outcome do you need? When is it required by?

Who needs to attend?

What preparation do they need to do? What should they bring with them?

Where is the appropriate venue? Onsite or off-site? What facilities and ambiance will help the meeting to be successful?

How long do you need and what is you back-up plan if you need a little more time?

A key to a successful meeting is having a process. This is more than an agenda (although you need one of those too!) A process tells you how you will move through the agenda, what tools and techniques you will use; tools such as brain-storming, voting, and many others. I ought to mention here that brain-storming is far more than just chucking out random ideas. There are multiple ways of doing it1 and it really is quite an art in itself.

You need to decide how you will reach decisions. Do you need to reach a consensus? Must it be unanimous? Will the boss just listen then decide? What kind of voting will you use?

What props and equipment do you need? How do you feel about Powerpoint slides; helpful or do they kill it stone dead?

Do you have a set of ground-rules of the behaviours that help and those which get in the way?

It is important to decide the roles of the various attendees. If you are calling the meeting, you are probably going to chair it. However, there is a whole raft of skills involved in doing this well and they don’t come naturally and require learning and developing. As the chair of the meeting you need to carefully listen to what everyone is saying and this makes it hard to also keep an eye on the process. If the meeting is important, then it is very helpful to have a trained facilitator. It is the facilitator’s job to ensure that the meeting stays on track, that you use the right tools and methods, to keep an eye on the energy levels and participation. If required, it is their job to press the ‘pause button’ and see if you need to either shelve a point, or go ‘off agenda’ and explore it. He is the conductor of the orchestra, and the chair is more like the customer. There also needs to be someone responsible for recording the decisions and action points.

“Meetings without an agenda are like a restaurant without a menu”. Susan B. Wilson

During:

Everyone should arrive before the meeting is scheduled to start, not at the start time. It is important to start and wherever possible, to end on time. If there is a case for over-running, then this should be negotiated, not assumed or happen by accident.

The chair should frame the meeting by reminding everyone why they are there and what is required. Any strangers should be introduced.

The bodily comforts should have been attended to and there should be lots of water there. Lighting, heating and acoustics need to be right.

The facilitator needs to ensure that there is full participation and that quieter ones are not being drowned out by the more garrulous ones. That people don’t say “Yes” when their body language suggests “No”. That the ground-rules are observed (things like no mobile phones! Only one person talking. No reading email in the meeting).

Roughly the meeting will split into two phases, an opening out exploring phase, and a closing down decision making one. The meeting may have a series of these phases.

If the energy levels are flagging, then take a short break but restart on time!

As the meeting draws to a close, the chair must make sure that he has the result that he needs. That people are clear what decisions have been made, what actions will be taken and by whom. If a follow-up meeting is required that should be booked now.

It is often helpful to go round all the attendees and ask them how they felt the meeting worked and what, if anything should be changed next time.

After:

The meeting notes need to be got our within 24hours of the meeting whilst everyone can still remember what was agreed. Everyone is responsible for their own actions. The facilitator and the chair should have a post-meeting debrief.

Every group has its own norms and culture, its own humour and repertoire of tools & techniques, but also every meeting has its own dynamics and it is truly an art to make them work on a consistent basis.

I hope this little guide will help you have more effective meetings in the future.

“Many people attempt to save time by not planning. This false short cut guarantees that everyone will spend more time later.”

Resources: